Read Time: 2.5 minutes
So, after trialling it for several weeks, Twitter has doubled its character limit, arguably abandoning the very thing that made it so unique in the first place. “Trying to cram your thoughts into a Tweet – we’ve all been there, and it’s a pain,” writes Product Manager Aliza Rosen, who wrote the blog that broke the news of Twitter's new character limit trial. The move was part of the social network’s continued aim to help people “easily express themselves”. After a study found that 9% of UK tweets utilised the full 140-character limit, the trial gave a small portion of users the new 280-character format, “collecting data and gathering feedback along the way”. The above figure is a staggering statistic in comparison to the likes of Japan (0.4%), China and Korea, where one character is generally able to convey a lot more meaning. So, that's the reason we got from the developers regarding Twitter's new character limit, but what aren’t they telling us? What has led them to sacrifice one of its most unique features? Twitter’s lack of growth has been well publicised over the last couple of years, and developers have been pushing to evolve and enhance the user experience in an attempt to get it back on track. Their work has been effective, with Twitter’s daily active users increasing by 11 percent in April this year. However, with competition from the likes of Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram, its revenues reportedly fell by 8% the same month. Twitter has 328million monthly users. Now compare that with Facebook’s 2 billion and you can see why it is struggling to compete. Its latest development has been in the pipeline for some time now, with founder and CEO Jack Dorsey coming very close to expanding the limit to 10,000 in early 2016. A 280-limit, albeit slightly less drastic, is still seen to be a viable solution to the frustration caused by the original figure. But how have the people of Twitter reacted? First, there was shock…While some praised and looked forward to the update…NO!!!!!! The beauty of @Twitter is fitting sense (and nonsense) into that character space. Don't mess up the core beauty of the app ????????????????
— Denzel Mwiyeretsi (@DenzelUG) September 26, 2017
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
— The Socializer (@SocializerSA) September 26, 2017
#twitter, hook me up with the 280 character limit please! #280CharacterTweet #280characters
— Bobson Dugnutt (@durfburner69) October 11, 2017
Most appeared to ridicule it…Having 280 characters is like wearing your belt too tight and then finally being allowed to wear sweatpants. #Twitter280Characters
— Red™ (@red_seventh) November 8, 2017
139 characters pic.twitter.com/WkfdXL8oLh
— Caitlin Kelly (@caitlin__kelly) September 26, 2017
The 280-character limit is a terrible idea. The whole beauty of Twitter is that it forces you to express your ideas concisely (1/47)
— James Poniewozik (@poniewozik) September 26, 2017
While others opted to outright criticize and disagree with Twitter's new character limit...After spending the last 10 years training our brains to think in 140 characters #280characters pic.twitter.com/GVC6rfgzqa
— TrivWorks (@TrivWorks) September 26, 2017
280 characters is going to ruin twitter #MarkMyWords
— Shane Rojek (@Rojek3151) September 26, 2017
Elsewhere, people decided to use it as an opportunity to take a dig at Donald Trump, who is a known frequent user of Twitter…Don't do this.. pic.twitter.com/S071iJASkl
— Josh Eberley ???????? (@JoshEberley) September 26, 2017
.@realDonaldTrump has been wrecking America 140 characters at a time. Imagine what he could do with 280 now.
— Vicente Fox Quesada (@VicenteFoxQue) September 27, 2017
Dear Twitter: Never give Donald Trump 280 characters. Sincerely, the world.
— Steph ???? (@pinkwaldd) October 23, 2017